Legal Opinion

Riedemann v. The Galileo

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided October 12, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Admiralty. Motion for decree and costs. For opinion of court, see 28 Fed. Rep. 469.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

Upon the settlement of the decree in this cause, the fact was first brought to the attention of the court that the appeal' which *539had been taken by the libelants from the decree of the district court had been withdrawn and abandoned, and therefore, at the time of the hearing in this court, the libelants were in the position of not having appealed from the decree. The libel was filed against the tug Baxter and the steam-ship Galileo, jointly, to recover damages to the bark of the libel-ants for a collision alleged to have been produced by the negligence of both the Baxter and the Galileo.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox and Dick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Thomas v. LaneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1813

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Towing Co. v. Masaba S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Munson S. S. Line v. Miramar S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Cunard Steamship Co. v. Norddeutsche Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  4. The AtlasU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1873
  5. The WillieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API