Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hansen v. Utah State Retirement Board

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 16714, 16560 and 16851Published

1Concurrence

CROCKETT, Retired Justice

(concurring with comments):

I concur with the main opinion. However, in my view there is a somewhat different rationale, grounded on fundamental principles, which supports its conclusion, and which I think is of sufficient significance and applicability to justify stating separately.

The first of those principles is that due to the respect that should be accorded the concept of the separation of powers in our system of government, the judiciary should exercise great restraint in intruding into the legislative prerogative. Consistent with that policy, there is indulged a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Newcomb v. Ogden City Public School Teachers' Retirement CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kimball v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API