People v. Ormsby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1245Defendant contends that his sentence is illegal because he should have been sentenced to two years of postrelease supervision instead of three years. Preliminarily, we note that defendant’s challenge to the legality of the sentence is not precluded by his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Greathouse, 62 AD3d 1212, 1213 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 744 [2009]; People v Robertson, 46 AD3d 928, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 844 [2008]). Turning to the merits, Penal Law § 70.45 (2) (b) provides that the period of postrelease supervision imposed upon a defendant convicted of a class B…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GreathouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. IliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. IliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012