Legal Opinion

Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Newsom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1962No. 30941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. P. MORGAN, Special Commissioner.

This action was brought by plaintiff, Charles Mitchell, an eight-year-old minor, by his father as next friend, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when he was bitten by a dog owned by defendant, Carl Newsom. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and instructed the jury to return a verdict for defendant. Upon his motion for a new trial being overruled, plaintiff has perfected this appeal.

The final question to be resolved is whether or not plaintiff made a submissible case for the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Clinkenbeard v. ReinertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Maxwell Ex Rel. Maxwell v. FrazeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Dansker v. GelbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Lloyd v. Alton Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. City of Fredericktown v. OsbornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Hof Ex Rel. Hof Ex Rel. Hof v. CloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Crimmins v. MirlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bradley v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API