Legal Opinion
United States v. Martorano, John
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1985No. 84-1511PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Section 1027 of Title 18 provides that it shall be a criminal offense to make a false statement in any document required by Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. 1 The major question for decision on this appeal is whether an understatement of profits by a health care organization that furnishes outpatient medical coverage to members of a health and welfare fund governed by ERISA constitutes a violation of the statute. The district court held that it does. See 596 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Pa.1984). We affirm.
I
Teamsters…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Michael CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. NardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. S & Vee Cartage Company, Inc., Silverio Vitello AKA Sal Vitello, and Anna VitelloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Michael C. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Furst, Sidney D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. TraitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen SARAULT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.