Legal Opinion

Clark v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1963No. 40265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. Where there is a permanent loss of use, either total or partial, resulting from an injury to a specific member, compensation may be had under Code Ann. § 114-406 and this is exclusive of compensation under §§ 114-404 and 114-405, unless in consequence of the injury to the member the claimant suffered a super-added injury or disease affecting other portions of his body, as a result of which he is either totally or partially disabled to work at gainful employment in which event compensation is payable under Code Ann. §§ 114-404 and 114-405. London Guarantee &c. Co. v. Ritchey,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Georgia Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Travelers Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. National Surety Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. RitcheyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanson Buick, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. City of Buford v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Benton v. United States Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Hanson Buick, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API