Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of West Helena v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1971No. 5-5493Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent because I think that the chancery court erred in holding that the action of the city authorities was arbitrary. I think the majority opinion is in error in ignoring decisions more recent than that on which it places its principal reliance—City of Little Rock v. Pfeifer, 169 Ark. 1027, 277 S. W. 883. In commenting on this case in City of Little Rock v. Parker, 241 Ark. 381, 407 S. W. 2d 921, we said:

The statute in force at the time of Pfeifer was Act 6 of the Second Extraordinary Session of the General Assembly of 1924, and cities of the first class were authorized to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. City of Little Rock v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. City of North Little Rock v. HabrleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API