Legal Opinion

State v. Sater

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1998No. C6-98-1463Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The trial court certified the following question: Does Minn.Stat. §§ 609.035 or 609.04 bar retrial when a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty of first-degree murder, but cannot reach a verdict on three other charged offenses that arose from the same behavioral incident? We answer this certified question in the negative.

FACTS

Defendant Kellie Ruth Sater was tried for (1) first-degree murder, (2) second-degree intentional murder, (3) second-degree felony murder, and (4) second-degree felony murder for the benefit of a gang. All four charges arose from a single behavioral…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. In Re ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. GurskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API