Legal Opinion

John W. Schoettmer & Karen Schoettmer v. Jolene C. Wright & South Central Community Action Program, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2013No. 49S04-1210-CT-607PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSA, Justice.

After he was injured in an automobile accident, John Schoettmer cooperated with the other driver’s insurer in hopes of settling his claim. Nearly a year later, when settlement proved elusive, he hired a lawyer and filed suit. Only then did he learn that the other driver was employed by a political subdivision subject to the Indiana Tort Claims Act. Schoettmer cited several reasons to excuse his failure to comply with the notice requirements of that Act, including waiver, substantial compliance, agency, and estoppel. We find the first three unavailing, but conclude he should be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Galbreath v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Collier v. PraterIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Woodruff v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Raymond Kerr v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Snyder v. Town of YorktownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Mills v. Hausmann-McNallyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Chris E. Harkins v. Shannon Westmeyer, Jon Niklas, Angie Harkins, and Janet HarkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API