Legal Opinion
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-17235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The motion by Appellants to Correct Factual Misstatement in Panel Opinion is GRANTED. The Opinion filed on February 9, 2010, slip op. page 2313, and appearing at 595 F.3d 949 (9th Cir.2010), is hereby amended as follows:
We delete the sentence on page 962 that currently reads:
On appeal, defendants concede that subsequent to the district court order, the government determined the district court was correct to order disclosure of the documents exchanged between the Executive Branch and Congress, as well as those in which the telecommunications firms were involved in the exchange.
In its…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Office of the Director of National IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Am. Small Bus. League v. Dep't of Def. & Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 97 OAG 095, Maryland Attorney General Reports2012