Legal Opinion

Verhelle v. State Banking Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1957No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 46,942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The bill of complaint in this cause was filed under the authority granted in section 21 of the Michigan financial institutions act (CL 1948, § 487.21 [Stat Ann 1943 Rev§ 23.739]). Plaintiffs are residents of the State of Michigan and are applicants in an application for permission to organize a bank under the laws of the State of Michigan, including PA 1937, No 341, known as the Michigan financial institutions act; and are parties of interest within the purview of sections 21 and 26, of the Michigan financial institutions act (CL 1948, §§ 487.21, 487.26 [Stat Ann 1943 Rev §§ 23.739, 23.754]).

D…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Babcock v. Public BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Northtown Bank v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Young v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API