Wilson v. State

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s untimely and successive motion for post-conviction relief/writ of habeas corpus. Appellant’s complaints about the process by which the prosecutor took sworn testimony before filing and then amending the information are improper in a post-conviction proceeding, untimely, and meritless. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So.3d 258, 262 (Fla.2011); Simon v. State, 997 So.2d 490, 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); State v. Williams, 362 So.2d 678, 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), dismissed, 368 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1979); State v. Hartung, 543 So.2d 236, 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

T…