Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Broderick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 29, 2008No. 97,088PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

Margaret R. Puls appeals the trial court denial of her pro se motion for participation in her will contest trial by telephone. The court then conducted the trial in her absence and admitted the will to probate. Puls seeks reversal, remand, and telephonic participation in the retrial. Our jurisdiction arises from K.S.A. 20-3018(c) (a transfer from the Court of Appeals on this court’s own motion).

The parties raise several issues on appeal, which we recast and answer as follows:

1. Did the trial court err in denying Puls’ participation in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Robert N. Colwell, Charles R. Ellinger and Richard H. Abrams, Jr. v. Suffolk County Police Department, County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Gohier v. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. In the Interest of K.E.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Chubb v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. LOUISBURG BLDG. & DEV'T CO. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API