Legal Opinion

State v. Otto Orr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 23, 2019No. A17A2096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gobeil, Judge.

Following his conviction for family violence battery and cruelty to children in the third degree, Otto Orr filed a motion for a new trial, asserting, inter alia, that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after the State impermissibly commented on Orr's pre-arrest silence. The trial court granted Orr's motion, finding that the exclusionary rule articulated by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Mallory v. State , 1 261 Ga. 625 , 409 S.E.2d 839 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Clark v. State , 271 Ga. 6 , 9-10, 515 S.E.2d 155 (1999), required that Orr receive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. State v. Otto OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Otto Jabar Orr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API