Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1998No. CR 97-1048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The procedural background in this matter is set forth in our per curiam opinion delivered on December 11, 1997. Muhammad v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997). Attorney Gregory Bryant, counsel for petitioner Altricia Muhammad, was ordered to appear before this court on January 8, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to file Ms. Muhammad’s brief in a timely manner. At his request, Mr. Bryant appeared on December 18, 1997, entered a plea of guilty to the contempt citation and accepted full responsibility for failing to file Ms. Muhammad’s brief.

Based…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muhammed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API