Turner v. Bartlett
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract, under the Gen. Sts. e. 124, § 10, upon a recognizance entered into on February 27, 1869, by George T. Reed, as principal, and the defendants, as sureties, conditioned that Reed, who had been arrested on the same day upon an execution issued on a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, should within thirty days from his arrest deliver himself up for examination before a magistrate, “ appear at the time and place fixed for his examination, and from time to time until the…
Read the full summary
Contract, under the Gen. Sts. e. 124, § 10, upon a recognizance entered into on February 27, 1869, by George T. Reed, as principal, and the defendants, as sureties, conditioned that Reed, who had been arrested on the same day upon an execution issued on a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, should within thirty days from his arrest deliver himself up for examination before a magistrate, “ appear at the time and place fixed for his examination, and from time to time until the same is concluded, and not depart without leave of the magistrate, making no default at any time fixed for his…
1Opinion of the CourtChapmatt, C. J.
George T. Reed had been arrested on an execution and brought before a magistrate. On February 27, 1869, he entered into a recognizance, in the form required by the Gen. Sts. c. 124, with the defendants as his sureties, for his appearance within thirty days for examination, and from time to time till the examination shall be concluded, and to abide the final order of the magistrate. He appeared at the time appointed, and from time to time at several adjournments. The *505last time fixed for his continued examination was April 24, 1869, when he failed to appear, and he did not appear again, though…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bigelow v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. THE STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975