Legal Opinion
Hesselgrave v. King
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge M. Fanelli, J.
In this article 78 CPLR proceeding petitioners seek to declare invalid a local law enacted by the City of Peekskill insofar as it relates to their residence requirements as policemen, and for incidental injunctive relief.
The material facts in this proceeding are undisputed.
Petitioners are three policemen in the City of Peekskill, all appointed prior to July 1,1961. At the time of their respective appointments they were residents of said city, although at the present time they reside outside said city but within the County of Westchester.
Local Law No. 3, effective October 15, 1964, under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Robinson v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Robinson v. County of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rozler v. FrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978