Legal Opinion

Normile v. R. H. Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1905No. 5374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered September 13, 1904, dismissing an action for an injunction, upon sustaining a demurrer to the defendants’ answer.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This case involves the “Eight hour law” of 1903. Respondent, on the 30th day of July, 1903, entered into a contract with the city of Seattle t< do some street improvement work. By the terms of his contract, he agreed to obey all laws and ordinances cont-oiling or limiting those engaged on the work. While the work was progressing, it being ascertained that his emplo zees were working more than eight hours per day, the cit z notified him to cease violating his contract in this partic ular, and at length threatened to cancel his contract, if hs did not desist. He brings this action to enjoin the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broad v. WoydtWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Driver v. GallandWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. O'Brien v. Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Creegan v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Seattle & Northern Railway Co. v. BowmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API