Legal Opinion

Durivage v. Vincent

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1960No. 4799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Adoption was unknown at common law and is wholly statutory. RSA ch. 461; Morse v. Osborne, 75 N. H. 487. “As adoption is in derogation of the common law right of the parent, consent of the natural parents is generally required and is a most important item of adoption proceedings.” Blue v. Boisvert, 143 Me. 173, 179. In its earlier form the statute of this jurisdiction providing for adoption required that the natural parents should consent thereto, or in the event of the death of either that the survivor should do so. Laws 1862, c. 2603, s. 2. The authority of the probate court to enter a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. MarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. In Re the Adoption of HolmanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wyness v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Adoption of MorrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Erickson v. RaspperryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Diana P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. In re NelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. In re Adoption of Baby C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. In Re Adoption of S. E. D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Smith v. Consul General of SpainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API