Commonwealth v. Bartholomew
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 146, Oct. T., 1907, by defendant, from judgment of O. and T. Lehigh Co., April T., 1907, No. 5, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Cornelius Bartholomew. Indictment for abortion. Before Trexler, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 146, Oct. T., 1907, by defendant, from judgment of O. and T. Lehigh Co., April T., 1907, No. 5, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Cornelius Bartholomew. Indictment for abortion. Before Trexler, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned were as follows: 1. The court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. 2. The court erred in entering judgment upon the verdict of the jury. 3. The court erred in not arresting the judgment for want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
The defendant was tried and convicted of the crime of abortion and, after sentence to the penitentiary, he appealed to this court.
The errors assigned are, first, the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment; second, the court erred in entering judgment upon the verdict of the jury; third, the court erred in not arresting the judgment for want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
The learned counsel for the defendant opens his printed *115argument thus: “the only question raised by the assignments of error in this case is whether…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Krause v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Pauli v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Commonwealth v. GurleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Commonwealth v. SchollenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.