In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
To comply with requirements of grand-jury secrecy, we will refer to the appellant as “Witness.” Witness is the sole member of a limited liability company (LLC) whose federal income taxes were being investigated by a grand jury. The “Custodian of Records” of the LLC was subpoenaed to bring LLC records to the grand jury. Aplt. App. at 38. As the records custodian, Witness moved to quash the subpoena duces tecum on the ground that it violated his personal Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Although recognizing the general rule that the records custodian of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Apple Macpro Computer Apple MaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Copar Pumice CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Cola Filho v. MubarakDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Lillis v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019