State v. Pope
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentBlake, C. J.
(dissenting) — Until the legislature gives specific authority to officers to break into a dwelling fiouse to execute a writ of replevin, I cannot acquiesce in a decision which sustains their right to do so. And, in view of the distinction always maintained in English and American jurisprudence between the dwelling house and other buildings, I think the court is not warranted in holding that the legislature of 1854, in enacting Rem. Rev. Stat., § 714 [P. C. § 8428], ever contemplated that the term “building” would ever be construed to mean dwelling house.
Our statutes defining first and second…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Hillman v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- State v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
- State v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.