Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 19, 1988No. Docket Nos. 22089-80; 4032-85UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEROY C. GRIFFITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Griffith v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 22089-80; 4032-85.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1988-445; 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 468; 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 220; T.C.M. (RIA) 88445;

September 19, 1988; As amended January 9, 1989

Theodore Brill and William H. Karo, for the petitioner.

Sharon Armuelles and Andrew Vanore, III, for the respondent.

PARR

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

PARR, Judge: In his 121 page statutory notice respondent determined the following deficiencies against petitioner individually:

Sec. 6653(b) 1

Year

Deficien…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API