Legal Opinion

Mason v. Tremayne

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926No. 19712PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Relief is sought after term in this cause by virtue of Section 11580, General Code, which provides:

“When, with reasonable diligence, the grounds for a new trial could not be discovered before, but are discovered after the term at which the verdict, report, or decision was rendered or made, the application may be by petition, filed not later than the second term after the discovery,” etc.

The gist of the claim of the plaintiff in error is that Tremayne gave false testimony, which, with reasonable diligence, could not be discovered until after the term at which the trial took place; that this…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minetti v. EinhornOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Rothstein v. RothsteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Thompson v. SamuelOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API