Legal Opinion

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Blackerby

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1918No. 4 Div. 741Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; A. B. Booster, Judge. Action by Ada Blackerby, formerly Ada Rambo, against the Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen. Judgment for plain' tiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

Counsel for appellee insists that the record on this appeal does not affirmatively show-that section 4579 of the Code is not applicable to the contract of insurance here sued upon, and that the case is not brought within the rule declared in Hughes’ Case, 77 South. 352A in this counsel is in error. The complaint, to which the pleas were, of course, answers, set out the contract sued on in hsec verba, and on its face it shows that it is not included within the contracts of insurance covered by section 4579 of tbe Code, and that it is included within tbe exceptions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Locomotive Engineers' Mut. Life & Accident Ins. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. KnightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API