Legal Opinion

Maryland Correctional Institution v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 2001No. 115, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The issues this case presents are whether, where a defendant insists that there is a conflict between the pronouncement of sentence and the commitment issued to the Division of Correction (“DOC”), the DOC’s failure to follow its policy requiring it to obtain correction of a commitment record, or independently interpret the transcript of a sentencing proceeding, is appropriately challenged by habeas corpus and whether the Baltimore City habeas corpus judge erred in his interpretation of the Montgomery County sentence. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City held that habeas…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Wilson v. SimmsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Simms v. Shearin, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Mateen v. GalleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Green v. HutchinsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API