Bache v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this protest for decision on an agreed set of facts, set forth in a written stipulation as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:
*3011. That the merchandise covered by the above entitled protest consists of glass prisms classified as scientific glassware under paragraph 218(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and assessed with duty at the rate of forty-two and one-half (42%%) per centum ad valorem thereunder;
2. That the attached sample is representative…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Semon Bache & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961