Legal Opinion

Avina v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 29, 2021No. 3:18-cv-01728Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISIS AVINA, Case No.: 18-CV-1728 W (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [DOC. 26] 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel Cyrus Safa’s (“Counsel”) motion 20 for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Counsel requests an order granting him 21 $14,000 in fees, with a credit to Plaintiff for the EAJA fees previously paid in the amount 22 of $3,447.69. Plaintiff was served…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. N. & G. Taylor Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API