Finglass v. George Franke Sons Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
The parties are adjoining owners of lots of ground, with improvements, on the west side of South Eutaw Street in Baltimore City, abutting on a rear alley, 'and the appellants seek to enjoin interference by the appellees with their use of the alley. The chancellor found that there was no sufficient ground for equitable jurisdiction, and dismissed the bill of complaint; and the appeal is from the dismissal.
The alley runs north from a narrow street now called Lemmon Street. In 1913 the Franke Company acquired two lots extending west from Eutaw Street, one abutting on Lemmon Street, and both on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MackenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Oberheim v. ReesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Clayton v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Gulick v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Greenbaum v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Schultz v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Potomac Edison Co. v. RoutzahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Dundalk Holding Co. v. EasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Glorius v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.