Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Marriage of Roney

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 2002No. 4-01-0785Published

1DissentJustice Cook

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the decision of the trial court. The majority opinion fails to address the special rules which apply when the fifth amendment is sought to be exercised in a civil case.

The interests of fundamental fairness and substantial justice outweigh the protections afforded by a privilege where plaintiff seeks to utilize those protections as a sword (rather than a shield) to prevent disclosure of relevant, probative, admissible, and not unduly prejudicial evidence. D.C. v. S.A., 178 Ill. 2d 551, 570, 687 N.E.2d 1032, 1041 (1997) (therapist-recipient relationship).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. People v. $1,124,905 U.S. CurrencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. D.C. v. S.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API