Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Kisha

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 2015No. 5D13-1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.

Litigants are entitled to a fair trial culminating in a jury verdict rendered after consideration of properly admitted evidence and the law. A jury verdict infused with sympathy for a litigant is based on emotion, not the evidence or the law, apd may be set aside. Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) invokes these well-established principles in this appeal, claiming that it did not receive a fair trial in the underlying declaratory judgment action because the trial court erroneously allowed Madeline Kisha to introduce evidence of her long relationship with GEICO, as an insured,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Publishing Company v. CopelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RevueltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Chin v. CAIAFFADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Stanley v. PowersSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Samuels v. TorresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY v. SANJAY KUWASDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. KishaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API