Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Inter-Mountain Salt Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1896No. 739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Third district court, Salt Lake county. Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by S. W. Morrisbn and others against the Inter-Mountain Salt GO', and others to foreclose a sub-eontract- or’s lien. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Babtch, J.:

It appears that the Inter-Mountain Salt Company, the appellant herein, was the owner of a certain parcel of land, and contracted with D. W. Gamble to erect a -storehouse and factory thereon for the manufacture of salt, and that the plaintiffs, under contract with Gamble, furnished certain materials, which were actually used in the construction of the buildings. Gamble failed to make full payment for the materials, and the plaintiffs, as subcontractors, pursuant to the -act of the territorial legislature approved March 12, 1890, filed and served notice of intention to claim a lien…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Carey-Lombard Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Teahen v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christenson Lumber Co. v. BuckleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Culmer v. Hooper-CaineUtah Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API