Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Fogos
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1995No. 67266PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harper, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Michael Fogos, appeals from his convictions by the Cleveland Municipal Court for violations of Cleveland Codified Ordinances by using a vacant lot as a parking lot and failing to screen and drain the property. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
The record shows that appellant is the titled owner of the property located at 3204-3206 Clark Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio. On or about August 19, 1992, appellant received a notice of violation of Cleveland Codified Ordinances 349.07(a), improper change of the use of a vacant lot to a parking lot by not providing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- N. Olmstead v. RockOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- City of Lakewood v. KrebsLakewood Municipal Court · 2008
- West Chester Township Zoning v. FrommOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Roswell v. HancockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. GraorOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.