United States v. Iverson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Marvin Iverson was convicted after a jury trial of engaging in a scheme to defraud JPMorgan Chase ánd Big Horn Federal Savings. See 18 U.S.C. § 1344. The statute requires that the victims be “financial institutions.” Id. To establish that element of the offense, tjhe government offered the testimony of an FBI agent to try to prove that JPMorgan and Big Horn were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). See id. § 20(1) (defining financial institution to include “an insured depository institution (as defined in [12 U.S.C. § 1813(c)(2)])”); 12…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Christopher Phelps & Associates, LLC v. GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A "Bucky," DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. McKibbonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- SWC Production, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. Wold Energy Partners, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.