Legal Opinion

Graham v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 27,933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is a proceeding commenced by Bertha M. Graham, Henry H. Miller and Nettie J. Glenn, children of Andrew Miller and Nancy Ann Miller, to probate the will of Nancy Ann Miller under the provisions of section 22-249 of the Revised Statutes. Andrew Miller, the husband of Nancy Ann Miller, was the only other *637party interested in the proceeding to probate the will.. His interests were antagonistic to those of Bertha M. Graham, Henry H. Miller and Nettie J. Glenn. On the hearing in the probate court, that court refused to admit the will to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. CaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In Matter of the Estate of Lambie v. McMillan (Mich. 10-2-1893)Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Anderson v. IrwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Greer v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Hill v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Fauser ex rel. Warren v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API