Legal Opinion

Brandywine Convalescent v. Ragoobir

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 2013No. 1D13-0982Published

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) argues that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred when he failed to accord the expert medical advisor’s (EMA’s) opinion a presumption of correctness and awarded Claimant permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. Because the JCC was not free, on this record, to reject the EMA’s opinion, we reverse.

The JCC here appointed an EMA under section 440.13(9), Florida Statutes (2008), to resolve a conflict in medical opinions regarding Claimant’s work restrictions from the industrial injury. Following an examination and review of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Osceola County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Blake v. Merck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Office Depot v. OrtegaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API