Fulghum & Lewis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “ The rule that the bringing of a suit in trover by a venuor of property wno has reserved title thereto in himself until payment of the purchase-price, and his election to tahe the property itseij, and his recovery of it, amount to a rescission of the contract of purchase, and that there can be no subsequent action for any further recovery, is not applicable to a case where the contract of sale contains a provision that if the note given for the purchase-price of the property is not paid at maturity, the vendor is authorized to repossess himself of the property, to sell it for cash at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pannell v. McGarityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Dickerson v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Campbell Motor Co. v. SpencerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Taylor Iron Works & Supply Co. v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. BallardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.