Legal Opinion

Fulghum & Lewis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1923No. 14592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “ The rule that the bringing of a suit in trover by a venuor of property wno has reserved title thereto in himself until payment of the purchase-price, and his election to tahe the property itseij, and his recovery of it, amount to a rescission of the contract of purchase, and that there can be no subsequent action for any further recovery, is not applicable to a case where the contract of sale contains a provision that if the note given for the purchase-price of the property is not paid at maturity, the vendor is authorized to repossess himself of the property, to sell it for cash at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pannell v. McGarityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Dickerson v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Campbell Motor Co. v. SpencerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Taylor Iron Works & Supply Co. v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. BallardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API