Kupelian v. . Andrews
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 8, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 8, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. This judgment should be reversed, because of the errors committed by the trial justice in his charge to the jury, and upon his refusals to charge, as requested by the defendant Andrews, in reference to certain provisions of the Highway Traffic Law and the ordinances of the city of Syracuse. (Winchell v. Town of Camillus, 100 App. Div. 341; 190 N. Y. 536; Guildi v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Hiscock, Ch. J.
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment awarding him damages for personal injuries suffered as the result of a collision between a motor truck and an automobile being driven by the defendant. It is unnecessary to state all of the details of the collision which resulted in plaintiff’s injuries for we deem it necessary to consider only one feature of the accident.
Defendant was driving westerly upon Genesee street in the city of Syracuse. Proceeding thus he came to the easterly end of what is known as Forman Park, and at that.point Genesee street swerved and passed upon the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Angiolillo v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Golf View Realty Co. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- City of Fort Worth v. Ryan Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Committee for Industrial Organization v. HagueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.