Legal Opinion

People v. Quinones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

As defendant failed to controvert his predicate felony status at the predicate felony hearing, any question concerning whether his New Jersey conviction for possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute is equivalent to a felony conviction in New York is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (People v Perez, 203 AD2d 123, 124, lv denied 83 NY2d 970). In any event, based upon the record before this Court, the relevant New Jersey statute (NJ *477Stat Annot § 24:21-19 [a] [1]) is equivalent to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API