Legal Opinion

Mills v. Ball

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 17, 1980No. Nos. MM-261, MM-282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Judge.

These are consolidated appeals from a partial final judgment in a declaratory judgment action brought below by all of the trustees under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils thereto of Alfred I. du-Pont, with the exception of William B. Mills, who was made a party defendant since he was not in agreement with the contentions of the other trustees on the questions presented for adjudication. The Will and Codicils of Alfred I. duPont established a trust to be administered by four trustees named in the Will (the Will and Codicils named certain alternates in the event those named…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Given v. HiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wallace v. JulierSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Moody v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Findley v. FaliseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. Barnhart v. HovdeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. In re the Henry Ford II Revocable Inter Vivos TrustCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API