Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2015Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING & DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

I commend the Majority for a thorough and thoughtful opinion. While I join Parts I, II, III, and IV(A-D) of the Majority opinion, I respectfully dissent as to Part IV(E) of the opinion.

Although there has been no final decision regarding whether to lease additional state lands for oil and natural gas development, the Majority nonetheless addresses this potentiality in Part IV(E) of the opinion. Courts should resolve actual disputes when they are presented, not give advisory opinions. Judicial constraint is particularly important when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Mazur v. Washington County Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Citizen Police Review Board v. MurphyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API