Legal Opinion

In re Eisenberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On motion to set aside order confirming a composition.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

In January, 1904, the bankrupt offered to the creditors a composition “at 20 per cent. * * * to be paid *326as follows: 10 per cent, thereof in cash, and the balance (to wit 10 per cent.) in promissory notes payable in six months and properly endorsed by Sajun & Tahelran.” This composition was agreed to by the requisite number of creditors, some of whom, however, prefixed to their written consent the condition “that indorser is satisfactory.” On March 27, 1905, after due proceedings, an order was entered declaring “that the said composition offered by the bankrupt herein be,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HurstU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1876
  2. In re NegleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. In re MerrimanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of NEWPORT HARBOR ASSOCIATES, D/B/A Newport Harbor Treadway, Inc., Etc. and James W. Kirby, Etc., Debtors, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. In re MirkusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Hopkins v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  5. In re Cooper Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API