Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles D. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1989No. 88-2649PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles D. Ross appeals his conviction, following a jury verdict, of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Supp. V 1987). Ross, who is black, argues the district court committed error in denying his motion to quash the jury panel. Ross made the motion on the ground that the government failed to give neutral reasons for exercising some of its peremptory challenges to strike two black jurors. We affirm.

To establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination in selecting the ve-nire panel, Ross must show he is a member of a cognizable racial group…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Oscar ClemonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Russell Dereck Battle, A/K/A BuckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. HoelscherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Jorge E. MarinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. John FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Kevin JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API