Legal Opinion

Kircher v. Hamill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

Appellant sought to enforce contribution by bill in equity. One of the appellees answered the hill and the other filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court. The plea was set for argument and. thereafter the court entered the following orders:

“Now on' the 21st day of February, A. D. 1925, the plea to the amended bill filed herein having been set down for argument and the court having carefully considered said plea, it is ordered by the court that said plea be and it is- allowed.
“Now on the 13th day of March, A. D. 1925, from the order of this court allowing plea to complainant’s bill,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago Portrait Co. v. Chicago Crayon Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Perry v. United States School Furniture Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Dreyer v. GoldyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Hesterman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People ex rel. Ring v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prange v. City of MarionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Reynolds v. WangelinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API