Legal Opinion
Le Witt v. Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 27, 1957No. Civ. A. Nos. 1505, 1529Published
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
The defendants in these treble damage suits under the anti-trust laws (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 7, 12, 15, 16, 22, 26) *308have moved for a partial summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a ruling in advance of any other proceedings that the cases are governed by the two-year New Hampshire statute of limitations pertaining to suits or prosecutions founded upon any penal statute for penalties and forfeitures. New Hampshire RSA 616:9. Since there is no applicable statute of limitations in the federal code, it is well established that this court must adopt the pertinent state…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Momand v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- Quimby v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.