Legal Opinion

Walsman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2006No. 69A04-0512-CR-701PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Shane Walsman appeals from his conviction and sentence for Robbery, as a Class B felony, following a jury trial. Walsman presents three issues for review, namely:

1. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support his conviction.

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it sentenced him.

3. Whether the trial court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 20, 2004, a white man dressed in dark clothes and wearing a black mask entered the Sunman Package Store…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Moreland v. DieterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Fields v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Barber v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Estate of Christopher A. Morel v. St. Joseph County Board of ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API