Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fort James Operating Co. v. Irby

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 9, 2004No. 2020598Published

1Concurrence

I dissent as to that portion of the main opinion declining to address the attorney-fee issue at this juncture. I would at this juncture instruct the trial court on remand to recalculate attorney fees based on the benefits to be awarded after the appropriate setoffs are applied. See Bruno's, Inc. v.Killingsworth, 879 So.2d 561, 565 (Ala.Civ.App. 2002) (Murdock, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), writ quashed,879 So.2d 568 (Ala. 2003); Fort James Operating Co. v. Thompson,871 So.2d 44, 49 (Ala.Civ.App. 2002) (Murdock, J., concurring in part, concurring in the result in part, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fort James Operating Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Bruno's, Inc. v. KillingsworthCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Bruno's, Inc. v. KillingsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API