Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Horvath v. Five Points National Bank of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 11, 1966No. 65-561Published

1ConcurrenceTillman Pearson, Judge

I am unable to agree that the plaintiffs’ failure to tender into the registry of the court the accrued interest and the principal payment, rendered the complaint fatally defective. I would distinguish Freitag upon the basis of the different allegations of the complaints in the two cases and upon the relief sought.

Nevertheless, I concur in the conclusion that the complaint in the instant case failed to state a cause of action and in the decision reached by the majority. My conclusion is based upon the principle that a parol contract, made at the time of or prior to the execution of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. First National Bank of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Schwartz v. ZaconickSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Rivers v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Merchants National Bank v. BryngelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Cockrell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API