Lease v. Christy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 15, April T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 215, on verdict for plaintiff-in case of L. S. Lease v. J. R. Christy. Assumpsit for commissions for sale of real estate. Before Patton, P. J. The opinion of the Superior court states the facts of the case. Error assigned was (5) refusal of binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,. This suit was brought to recover $125 with interest as a commission which the plaintiff claimed for negotiating a sale of certain real estate owned by the defendant. The material *508facts are not disputed and the effect to be given to them maybe disposed of in considering the assignment of error to the court’s refusal to affirm the defendant’s third point, which is as follows: “ Under all the evidence in this case, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and the verdict should be in favor of the defendant.” This was refused by the court below with a reference to an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Persch v. QuiggleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Linderman v. McKennaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Brown v. ArrottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Devall v. BurbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Arrott v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.