Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Reliable Fur Dressing & Dyeing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 8, 1912Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Barnet Cohn against the Reliable Fur Dressing & Dyeing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying, a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHotchkiss, J.

Action for damages for failure to skillfully dye skins. The evidence was sufficient to go to the jury. Most of the questions argued by appellant were not saved by exception. The charge was not excepted to, nor was there exception to the refusal to charge as requested, if in fact there was any such refusal, which is not clear.

I think, however, the verdict was excessive and should be reduced. Plaintiff sued for damages to 40 skins. He testified that their sound value, when he delivered them to defendant, was $9 or $10 each. One Briosnick, a dealer in skins, called by plaintiff, testified that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Emmerich v. ChegnayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API